Está a Champions League a matar os campeonatos nacionais - By David James

[miguel_afonso]

The chase for the Champions League dollars is breeding mediocrity

The Premier league has become about the chase for Champions League – finish fourth, stay solvent, but don't win anything

Has the Champions League ruined football? While some may be salivating over the prospect of watching Barcelona's Lionel Messi work his magic against Chelsea next week, I can't help feeling Europe's most prestigious cup competition is in part responsible for reducing our beautiful game to a cash cow.

While Chelsea fans may dream of defeating Europe's premier team, Ron Gourlay, Chelsea's chief executive, has already admitted he would rather the club finish fourth in the Premier League. Why? So Chelsea can play in the Champions League again next season. Let me get that straight: Gourlay's club are in the quarter-finals of the competition right now and yet all he can think about is reaching the qualifying stage of the same competition next season. That's just madness isn't it? Whatever happened to the concept of playing to win? It seems Europe's most prestigious cup competition is fostering a cynical cult of finishing fourth, otherwise known as chasing the dollar.

A quick glance at the economics would appear to confirm that theory. Last season, despite crashing out of the Champions League in the round of 16, Arsenal still managed to earn themselves an extra £24.7m. Chelsea made the quarter-finals and picked up £36.7m, Manchester United finished as runners-up, earning £43.8m, while Tottenham – in their debut Champions League season and without the same brand power as the others – still bagged £25.6m.

No wonder Arsène Wenger and his employers are happy enough to keep finishing in the top four without having won a trophy in seven years. Arguably perhaps, with the club boasting the healthiest finances in the Premier League, Wenger is the clever one who understands this game for what it is: keep picking up the pay cheques and don't overstretch yourself financially in the pursuit of winning.

Having witnessed first hand the devastating effect that overstretching can have on a club during my time at Portsmouth, I have utmost sympathy for Rangers supporters currently struggling to get their heads around how, just last season, their club collected a tidy sum of £15.2m for taking part in the group stages of the Champions League, while this season they face administration. It was a similar story with Leeds United – Champions League semi-finalists in 2001, they were relegated from the Premier League just three years later. At Portsmouth, we enjoyed our time in the spotlight; the surreal but magical day when Milan – a team packed with stars, including Ronaldinho – came to play at Fratton Park will live long in the memory of Pompey fans. But such experiences come at a price and it all unravelled very quickly after that.

I've never played in the Champions League and I have to admit it does frustrate me every time I think about it, but who would chase after Champions League football merely to tick a box? Maccabi Haifa and Basel players have taken part in the competition and, with all due respect, I wouldn't wish to trade my career with theirs. That is probably down to my obsession with winning. Having been on the losing team in two FA Cup finals, I can honestly say I would rather have been knocked out in the third round. People say it's the taking part that counts, but aside from representing your country at international tournaments I just can't agree.

Saying that, I did have half a chance at some Champions League action after leaving Portsmouth. Celtic were interested in me joining them and a large part of their sales pitch was the lure of Champions League football. Admittedly my ears pricked up at that point. But during the negotiating stages Celtic were knocked out in the preliminary round and suddenly the fixture list was looking more Rugby Park than Bernabéu. In the end I wanted to be closer to home.

Look at the stats and neither the Premier League nor La Liga are quite as competitive as we may wish them to be. Spanish and English clubs boast more Champions League semi-final appearances than any other countries, but their leagues are not the most competitive in Europe. Just two clubs have dominated the league winners' list in England and Spain for the past seven years – Manchester United and Chelsea, Barcelona and Real Madrid. Cast an eye further back and it would seem that, ever since the introduction of the Champions League, English football has suffered in its depth and breadth of competitiveness. While seven different clubs claimed the domestic title in the 19 years preceding the inaugural Champions League season, only four clubs have won that title in the 19 years since.

Compare this to the Bundesliga, which has enjoyed six different domestic league winners since 1992. And it is no coincidence that German clubs are much lower down the pecking order in the Champions League semi-final appearances stakes (currently fifth), not having won the competition since Bayern Munich's victory in 2001. That has much to do with the Bundesliga's prudent financial restrictions on ownership by which fans must own 50% of the shares in their club, plus one vote, protecting clubs from risky takeovers. The Bundesliga also enjoys low ticket prices and record high attendances.

Sadly our own league has become too much about the chase for Champions League football. It is Wenger's model – finish fourth, get paid, stay solvent, but don't win anything. At least it guarantees a future for the club, but I can't help feeling disappointed by it. Just as boom and bust is an unsavoury way to run a football club, mediocrity – as a second-best option – is hardly something to celebrate.

In http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/blog/2012/apr/08/champions-league-mediocrity-david-james

Um ponto de vista muito interessante sobre o facto dos países que mais vezes tiveram semifinalistas, são os que tem os campeonatos menos competitivos...

[rvx]

Está tudo relacionado. O desequilíbrio, a falta de aposta nos jogadores nacionais e consequente perda de qualidade da selecção, o decréscimo do número de espectadores, etc. A Alemanha é uma das melhores selecções pelas razões apontadas no artigo.

Em Portugal, com a subida de rendimento de Porto e Benfica, acho que o desequilíbrio tem aumentado. O Braga deve ser o único clube onde se deu o fenómeno contrário, em parte porque Salvador soube adaptar-se muito bem a estas novas "regras". Enquanto clubes ricos se podem dar ao luxo de manter plantéis caríssimos e com extrema qualidade, os pobres, como nós, usam as suas armas ou definham. No nosso caso, o Salvador sabe comprar barato e vender caro, mas ninguém garante que isto irá durar.

[PAF]

O meu inglês não é grande coisa, mas a Champions basicamente é oq ue faz a diferença entre os grandes e os outros.
Acho que já escrevi por cá e noutros fóruns, se o Braga este ano consegue a Champions, e continuar com esta gestão, e  nos próximos 4/5 anos mantiver este nivel, será difícil ao Sporting recolocar-se no nosso lugar, a diferença entre Champions e nada são com uma participação razoável, 15/20milhões de euros, ou seja o nosso orçamento, isto mais valorização de jogadores, patrocínios, etc.
O Porto tem aproveitado bem esta vantagem monetária, aliado a uma boa gestão (acho que financeiramente já teve melhores dias)
Quanto mais ganhas mais te sujeitas a ganhar, é quase um ciclo vicioso, e os que não ganham sujeitam-se ao mercado e a ser cada vez mais pequenos, não há dinheiro, não há vitórias, não há patrocínios, não há bons jogadores, etc.